Delta Dental Plan Disclaimer
by David A. Hall, DDS
Dental
insurance is a mixed blessing, and Delta plans are a great
illustration of this.
Practitioners have been increasing finding Delta Delta more and more
difficult for dentists to deal with. We had some experiences with them in
my final years practicing in Iowa, during 2000 to 2002, that showed them
more toward focusing on increasing their profitability at the expense of
the dental practices they supposedly existed to serve. They slipped a
change through their rules during that time period that enabled them to
significantly cut costs. It was legitimately voted on, but the
overwhelming majority of dentists didn't realize what they were doing.
Before the rule change, their fees were set by a survey of participating
dentists. A little twist in the proposed language that was sent out to
participating dentists disconnected the fee survey from the fee-setting
process. The technicality was noticed by practically no one, and no one in
authority in the dental association spoke up, so it quietly passed. What
makes the fee-setting by Delta more significant, is that participating
dentists agree to accept Delta's fees as payment in full for services,
regardless of how serious the discount.
When Delta Dental started, the discounts enforced on dentists were minor and infrequent. However,
many state plans have been moving toward deeper and more significant
cost-trimming measures to where they are now, if they are completely
followed, threatening quality of care.
In our office, we took a stand on several
issues and refused to acknowledge their discounts on what we felt were
solid grounds. For example, in Iowa, they decided they didn't want to pay
for buildups on teeth that require crowns. I read the contract carefully,
and it gives dentists the latitude to pursue an alternate non-covered
treatment, with the patient's consent, and charge whatever fee the dentist
feels is fair. When they threatened action against me because I was going
against their policy, I boldly stated that I considered the non-payment of
buildups a non-covered service, and I was therefore free to charge it.
In other actions, they determined that they
weren't going to pay for periodontal maintenance procedures for more than
a year past the original perio scaling appointment. They tried to get me
to charge only for a regular cleaning, but I was determined to charge the
full cost of the periodontal maintenance procedure and to get the patient
on my side in doing so.
What I did to accomplish this, and to help
insure me against action by Delta, is that I developed a disclaimer form
for all my Delta patients. In the disclaimer, I specifically state these
issues we had with Delta. I said that Delta did not want to pay for a
buildup before doing a crown. I explained that I was taught in dental
school that whenever we did a crown preparation, we were to remove all the
restorative material from the tooth to make sure it was completely clean
and free of decay. I explained that the American Dental Association had a
separate insurance code for a buildup, and that it was recognized by them
as a separate procedure, and the typical practice was to bill separately
for it. I then wrapped up my comments by telling them, in the form, that I
recommended that we do this buildup, but they needed to understand that it
was at their full expense, since Delta wouldn't provide any benefits for
the procedure. We then flagged the procedure so that it wouldn't appear on
the insurance claim form.
I had a similar form for periodontal
procedures, and asked for their agreement to the higher maintenance fee
that wouldn't be covered by their dental plan. Almost all patients would
agree to not be beholding to their insurance company recommendation
because they trust us as their dental office.
We had a similar problem for highly esthetic
anterior crowns that far exceeded Delta's allotment. We split the fee into
an esthetic component and a restorative component. The fee for the
restorative component was low enough to be covered by Delta. The esthetic
component was given a miscellaneous code, and the patient was told that
their insurance would not cover this. They would always choose the more
esthetic crown and pay the difference. And Delta quit bothering us over
this.
Here's the key when you're working with insurance companies and patients.
If your patient understands your fee and what the insurance coverage will
be before undergoing treatment, you will not have a complaining
patient and all the efforts of the insurance company to alienate you from
that patient will come to naught. However, if you surprise the patient
with more to pay than was agreed upon, they may call on the dental plan to
help defend them and you're the one in the vulnerable corner of the
triangle, and you will lose.
Start with a disclaimer such as the
following, and then expand it to be more specific about the treatment
proposed and the payment expected. The disclaimer is easier to use if you
have a dental practice accounting software like Dentech that keeps
excellent track of exactly what certain dental plans are paying for
certain procedures. I
understand the limitations of my dental plan as described above. If I or
anyone in my family chooses a higher level of care than what my insurance
covers, I agree to pay the amount not covered by my dental plan
Click here to find clinical books.
More dental articles
America's Dental Bookstore maintains this collection of articles on dentistry submitted by visitors to our site. These
could be clinical tips, research articles, opinion articles, dental jokes, or
whatever. Do you have something you'd like to submit? If so, click here to
submit a dental article. |